Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder eating line programming" » "coder coder eating linear programming" (Expand search), "coder coder eating cone programming" (Expand search), "coder coder eating linear programmin" (Expand search), "coder over eating line programming" (Expand search), "coder vocoder rating line programming" (Expand search), "coder proper eating line programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder eating line programming" (Expand search), "code code eating line programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec eating line programming" (Expand search), "coder coder eating binge programming" (Expand search), "coder coder coating line programming" (Expand search), "coder coder eating in programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder eating line programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder eating line programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder eating line programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder eating line programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.