Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder eating context object" » "coder coder learning context object" (Expand search), "coder coder teaching context object" (Expand search), "coder coder enabling context object" (Expand search), "coder coder eating content object" (Expand search), "coder coder eating concept object" (Expand search), "coder coder eating contract object" (Expand search), "coder over eating context object" (Expand search), "coder vocoder rating context object" (Expand search), "coder proper eating context object" (Expand search), "coder decoder eating context object" (Expand search), "code code eating context object" (Expand search), "decoder codec eating context object" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder eating context object") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder eating context object\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder eating context object ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder eating context object") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.