Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"and python python python programming" » "and pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "and piton python python programming" (Expand search), "and pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "on python python python programming" (Expand search), "api python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder easing labor process" » "coder code using labor process" (Expand search), "coder codes using labor process" (Expand search), "coder coders using labor process" (Expand search), "coder coder caring labor process" (Expand search), "coder coder aging labor process" (Expand search), "coder coder facing labor process" (Expand search), "coder decoder easing labor process" (Expand search), "code code easing labor process" (Expand search), "decoder codec easing labor process" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder easing labor process") OR ("and python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder easing labor process\") OR (\"and python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder easing labor process ) OR ( and python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder easing labor process") OR ("and python python python programming"))*.