Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder during optical processing" » "coder coder during spatial processing" (Expand search), "coder coder during lexical processing" (Expand search), "coder coder during chemical processing" (Expand search), "coder coder using optical processing" (Expand search), "coder coder during topical processing" (Expand search), "coder coder during apical processing" (Expand search), "coder cover during optical processing" (Expand search), "coder powder during optical processing" (Expand search), "coder border during optical processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder during optical processing" (Expand search), "code code during optical processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec during optical processing" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder during optical processing") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder during optical processing\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder during optical processing ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder during optical processing") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.