Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder doing design processes" » "coder coder doing design process" (Expand search), "coder coder coding design processes" (Expand search), "coder coder dating design processes" (Expand search), "coder coder using design processes" (Expand search), "coder decoder doing design processes" (Expand search), "code code doing design processes" (Expand search), "decoder codec doing design processes" (Expand search), "coder codes going design processes" (Expand search), "coder modelo doing design processes" (Expand search), "coder coders using design processes" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder doing design processes") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder doing design processes\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder doing design processes ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder doing design processes") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.