Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder doing buying processes" » "coder coder doing buying process" (Expand search), "coder coder doing drying processes" (Expand search), "coder coder doing curing processes" (Expand search), "coder coder doing being processes" (Expand search), "coder coder on buying processes" (Expand search), "coder coder in buying processes" (Expand search), "coder decoder doing buying processes" (Expand search), "code code doing buying processes" (Expand search), "decoder codec doing buying processes" (Expand search), "coder codes going buying processes" (Expand search), "coder modelo doing buying processes" (Expand search), "coder coders using buying processes" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder doing buying processes\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder doing buying processes ) OR ( on python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder doing buying processes") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.