Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder dogs affecting processing" » "coder coder dogs affective processing" (Expand search), "coder coder dogs affects processing" (Expand search), "coder coder dogs harvesting processing" (Expand search), "coder coder doses affecting processing" (Expand search), "coder coder dams affecting processing" (Expand search), "coder coder dosage affecting processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder dogs affecting processing" (Expand search), "code code dogs affecting processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec dogs affecting processing" (Expand search), "coder boxer dogs affecting processing" (Expand search), "coder older dogs affecting processing" (Expand search), "coder code does affecting processing" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder dogs affecting processing") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder dogs affecting processing\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder dogs affecting processing ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder dogs affecting processing") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.