Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder distance dependent programming" » "coder coder distance independent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder distance dependent reprogramming" (Expand search), "coder coder distance element programming" (Expand search), "coder coder substance dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder state dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder substance dependence programming" (Expand search), "coder power distance dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder gower distance dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder model distance dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder distance dependent programming" (Expand search), "code code distance dependent programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec distance dependent programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder distance dependent programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder distance dependent programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder distance dependent programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder distance dependent programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.