Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder dissipation dinamic programming" » "coder coder dissipation dynamics programming" (Expand search), "coder coder dissipative dynamics programming" (Expand search), "coder coder dissipation kinetics programming" (Expand search), "coder coder dissipation dynamic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder dissipation dynamic programing" (Expand search), "coder coder dissipation genetic programming" (Expand search), "coder power dissipation dinamic programming" (Expand search), "coder order dissipation dinamic programming" (Expand search), "coder model dissipation dinamic programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder dissipation dinamic programming" (Expand search), "code code dissipation dinamic programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec dissipation dinamic programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder dissipation dinamic programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder dissipation dinamic programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder dissipation dinamic programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder dissipation dinamic programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.