Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder discursive proof progress" » "coder poder discursivo proof progress" (Expand search), "coder color discursive proof progress" (Expand search), "coder power discursive proof progress" (Expand search), "coder coder discursive proposal progress" (Expand search), "coder coder discursive process progress" (Expand search), "coder coder discursive body progress" (Expand search), "coder coder discursive of progress" (Expand search), "coder coder discursive program progress" (Expand search), "coder decoder discursive proof progress" (Expand search), "code code discursive proof progress" (Expand search), "decoder codec discursive proof progress" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder discursive proof progress") OR ("api python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder discursive proof progress\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder discursive proof progress ) OR ( api python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder discursive proof progress") OR ("api python python python programming"))*.