Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder discursive on programming" » "coder poder discursivo on programming" (Expand search), "coder power discursive on programming" (Expand search), "coder color discursive on programming" (Expand search), "coder coder discursive in programming" (Expand search), "coder coder discursive cone programming" (Expand search), "coder coder discursive and programming" (Expand search), "coder coder discursive an programming" (Expand search), "coder coder discursive _ programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder discursive on programming" (Expand search), "code code discursive on programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec discursive on programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in python python pythin programming" (Expand search), "in python python pythcone programming" (Expand search), "in python python pythand programming" (Expand search), "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder discursive on programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder discursive on programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder discursive on programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder discursive on programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.