Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder discursive dependence programming" » "coder coder discursive dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder discursive independent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder discursive dependent reprogramming" (Expand search), "coder coder discursive evidence programming" (Expand search), "coder coder discursive reference programming" (Expand search), "coder coder dispersion dependence programming" (Expand search), "coder poder discursivo dependence programming" (Expand search), "coder power discursive dependence programming" (Expand search), "coder color discursive dependence programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder discursive dependence programming" (Expand search), "code code discursive dependence programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec discursive dependence programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder discursive dependence programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder discursive dependence programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder discursive dependence programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder discursive dependence programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.