Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder discursive application programming" » "coder coder discursive application program" (Expand search), "coder coder disruptive applications programming" (Expand search), "coder coder discursive validation programming" (Expand search), "coder coder discursive agglutination programming" (Expand search), "coder poder discursivo application programming" (Expand search), "coder power discursive application programming" (Expand search), "coder color discursive application programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder discursive application programming" (Expand search), "code code discursive application programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec discursive application programming" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder discursive application programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder discursive application programming\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder discursive application programming ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder discursive application programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.