Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder discourse dependent programming" » "coder coder discourse independent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder discourse dependent reprogramming" (Expand search), "coder coder discourse element programming" (Expand search), "coder coder discursive dependence programming" (Expand search), "coder coder dismutase dependente programming" (Expand search), "coder code discourse dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder coded discourse dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder border discourse dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder discourse dependent programming" (Expand search), "code code discourse dependent programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec discourse dependent programming" (Expand search)
"via python python python programming" » "via pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "via piton python python programming" (Expand search), "via pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder discourse dependent programming") OR ("via python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder discourse dependent programming\") OR (\"via python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder discourse dependent programming ) OR ( via python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder discourse dependent programming") OR ("via python python python programming"))*.