Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder diets use programming" » "coder coder diets user programming" (Expand search), "coder coder diets rule programming" (Expand search), "coder coder diets the programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder diets use programming" (Expand search), "code code diets use programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec diets use programming" (Expand search), "coder modern diets use programming" (Expand search), "coder coder diets used programming" (Expand search), "coder coder its use programming" (Expand search), "coder coder diets is programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder diets use programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder diets use programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder diets use programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder diets use programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.