Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder development vocalization pattern" » "coder coder development socialization pattern" (Expand search), "coder coder development globalization pattern" (Expand search), "coder coder development validation pattern" (Expand search), "coder coder development localization pattern" (Expand search), "coder coder development localization patterns" (Expand search), "coder coder development specialization pattern" (Expand search), "coder code development vocalization pattern" (Expand search), "coder cover development vocalization pattern" (Expand search), "coder border development vocalization pattern" (Expand search), "coder decoder development vocalization pattern" (Expand search), "code code development vocalization pattern" (Expand search), "decoder codec development vocalization pattern" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder development vocalization pattern\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder development vocalization pattern ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder development vocalization pattern") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.