Talvez deva tentar algumas variações de ortografia:
"coder coder development logging process" » "coder coder development clothing process" (Expandir a busca), "coder coder development engaging process" (Expandir a busca), "coder coder development working process" (Expandir a busca), "coder code development logging process" (Expandir a busca), "coder cover development logging process" (Expandir a busca), "coder border development logging process" (Expandir a busca), "coder coder development clogging process" (Expandir a busca), "coder coder development forging process" (Expandir a busca), "coder coder development jigging process" (Expandir a busca), "coder decoder development logging process" (Expandir a busca), "code code development logging process" (Expandir a busca), "decoder codec development logging process" (Expandir a busca)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expandir a busca), "_ piton python python programming" (Expandir a busca), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expandir a busca)

Você pode obter mais resultados ajustando o argumento de busca.

• Fazer uma busca fuzzy pode resultar em termos de grafias semelhantes: (("coder coder development logging process") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• As palavras AND, OR e NOT pode ocasionar problemas na busca; tente utilizar as aspas: "((\"coder coder development logging process\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))*".
• Remover as aspas pode possibilitar buscas mais amplas: (( coder coder development logging process ) OR ( _ python python python programming ))*.