Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder developing shading effect" » "coder coder developing reading effect" (Expand search), "coder coder developing speaking effect" (Expand search), "coder coder developing branding effect" (Expand search), "coder leader developing shading effect" (Expand search), "coder modelo developing shading effect" (Expand search), "coder models developing shading effect" (Expand search), "coder coder developing shading effects" (Expand search), "coder coder developing loading effect" (Expand search), "coder coder developing cascading effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder developing shading effect" (Expand search), "code code developing shading effect" (Expand search), "decoder codec developing shading effect" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search), "manim python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder developing shading effect") OR ("api python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder developing shading effect\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder developing shading effect ) OR ( api python python python programming ))*.