Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder developing neural code" » "coder coder development neural code" (Expand search), "coder coder developing oral code" (Expand search), "coder coder developing cerebral code" (Expand search), "coder models developing neural code" (Expand search), "coder leader developing neural code" (Expand search), "coder modelo developing neural code" (Expand search), "coder decoder developing neural code" (Expand search), "code code developing neural code" (Expand search), "decoder codec developing neural code" (Expand search), "coder coder developing neuronal code" (Expand search), "coder coder developing neural model" (Expand search), "coder coder developing neural co" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder developing neural code") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder developing neural code\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder developing neural code ) OR ( in python python python programming ))*.