Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder developing motion processing" » "coder coder developing emotion processing" (Expand search), "coder coder developing action processing" (Expand search), "coder coder developing emotional processing" (Expand search), "coder coder developing ration processing" (Expand search), "coder coder developing onion processing" (Expand search), "coder leader developing motion processing" (Expand search), "coder modelo developing motion processing" (Expand search), "coder models developing motion processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder developing motion processing" (Expand search), "code code developing motion processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec developing motion processing" (Expand search)
"api pitons python python programming" » "api pitons pythons python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons piton python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "api citons python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitoni python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitoes python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder developing motion processing") OR ("api pitons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder developing motion processing\") OR (\"api pitons python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder developing motion processing ) OR ( api pitons python python programming ))*.