Talvez deva tentar algumas variações de ortografia:
"coder coder developing embedded coder" » "coder coder revealing embedded coder" (Expandir a busca), "coder models developing embedded coder" (Expandir a busca), "coder leader developing embedded coder" (Expandir a busca), "coder modelo developing embedded coder" (Expandir a busca), "coder coder developing embedded copper" (Expandir a busca), "coder coder developing embedded model" (Expandir a busca), "coder coder developing embedded power" (Expandir a busca), "coder decoder developing embedded coder" (Expandir a busca), "code code developing embedded coder" (Expandir a busca), "decoder codec developing embedded coder" (Expandir a busca)
"in python on python programming" » "_ python on python programming" (Expandir a busca), "in python of python programming" (Expandir a busca), "in python in python programming" (Expandir a busca), "in python and python programming" (Expandir a busca), "in python _ python programming" (Expandir a busca), "in python monty python programming" (Expandir a busca)

Você pode obter mais resultados ajustando o argumento de busca.

• Fazer uma busca fuzzy pode resultar em termos de grafias semelhantes: (("coder coder developing embedded coder") OR ("in python on python programming"))~.
• As palavras AND, OR e NOT pode ocasionar problemas na busca; tente utilizar as aspas: "((\"coder coder developing embedded coder\") OR (\"in python on python programming\"))*".
• Remover as aspas pode possibilitar buscas mais amplas: (( coder coder developing embedded coder ) OR ( in python on python programming ))*.