Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder developing deep programming" » "coder modelo developing deep programming" (Expand search), "coder leader developing deep programming" (Expand search), "coder models developing deep programming" (Expand search), "coder coder developing step programming" (Expand search), "coder coder developing delphi programming" (Expand search), "coder coder developing free programming" (Expand search), "coder coder developing area programming" (Expand search), "coder coder developing novel programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder developing deep programming" (Expand search), "code code developing deep programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec developing deep programming" (Expand search)
"api in python python programming" » "api in pythons python programming" (Expand search), "api in piton python programming" (Expand search), "api in pitons python programming" (Expand search), "api _ python python programming" (Expand search), "api an python python programming" (Expand search), "fpi in python python programming" (Expand search), "gpi in python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder developing deep programming") OR ("api in python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder developing deep programming\") OR (\"api in python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder developing deep programming ) OR ( api in python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder developing deep programming") OR ("api in python python programming"))*.