Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder developing attention effects" » "coder coder developing action effects" (Expand search), "coder coder developing partition effects" (Expand search), "coder coder developing potential effects" (Expand search), "coder coder developing attention effect" (Expand search), "coder coder developing intention effects" (Expand search), "coder coder developing attentional effect" (Expand search), "coder leader developing attention effects" (Expand search), "coder modelo developing attention effects" (Expand search), "coder models developing attention effects" (Expand search), "coder decoder developing attention effects" (Expand search), "code code developing attention effects" (Expand search), "decoder codec developing attention effects" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search), "manim python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder developing attention effects\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder developing attention effects ) OR ( api python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder developing attention effects") OR ("api python python python programming"))*.