Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder developing addition effect" » "coder coder developing partition effect" (Expand search), "coder coder developing action effect" (Expand search), "coder coder developing variation effect" (Expand search), "coder leader developing addition effect" (Expand search), "coder modelo developing addition effect" (Expand search), "coder models developing addition effect" (Expand search), "coder coder developing additional effect" (Expand search), "coder coder developing addition affects" (Expand search), "coder coder developing additive effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder developing addition effect" (Expand search), "code code developing addition effect" (Expand search), "decoder codec developing addition effect" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search), "manim python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder developing addition effect\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder developing addition effect ) OR ( api python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder developing addition effect") OR ("api python python python programming"))*.