Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder developed in objects" » "coder model developed in objects" (Expand search), "coder over developed in objects" (Expand search), "coder power developed in objects" (Expand search), "coder decoder developed in objects" (Expand search), "code code developed in objects" (Expand search), "decoder codec developed in objects" (Expand search), "coder coder developed in object" (Expand search), "coder coder developed on objects" (Expand search), "coder coder developed and objects" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder developed in objects\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder developed in objects ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder developed in objects") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.