Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder develop patent process" » "coder coder develop patient process" (Expand search), "coder coder develop patents process" (Expand search), "coder coder develop ment process" (Expand search), "coder coder develop point process" (Expand search), "coder coder develop plant process" (Expand search), "coder coder develop treatment process" (Expand search), "coder co develop patent process" (Expand search), "coder or develop patent process" (Expand search), "coder zones develop patent process" (Expand search), "coder decoder develop patent process" (Expand search), "code code develop patent process" (Expand search), "decoder codec develop patent process" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder develop patent process") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder develop patent process\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder develop patent process ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder develop patent process") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.