Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder detects live programming" » "coder coder detects line programming" (Expand search), "coder coder detects time programming" (Expand search), "coder coder detects driven programming" (Expand search), "coder solder defects live programming" (Expand search), "coder body detects live programming" (Expand search), "coder under detect live programming" (Expand search), "coder coder detect lie programming" (Expand search), "coder coder detect life programming" (Expand search), "coder coder detects novel programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder detects live programming" (Expand search), "code code detects live programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec detects live programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder detects live programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder detects live programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder detects live programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder detects live programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.