Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder detection funcional programming" » "coder coder detection functional programming" (Expand search), "coder coder detection fractional programming" (Expand search), "coder coder detection nutritional programming" (Expand search), "coder coder direction functional programming" (Expand search), "coder coder detection functions programming" (Expand search), "coder code detection funcional programming" (Expand search), "coder border detection funcional programming" (Expand search), "coder copper detection funcional programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder detection funcional programming" (Expand search), "code code detection funcional programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec detection funcional programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder detection funcional programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder detection funcional programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder detection funcional programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder detection funcional programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.