Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder detecting logic programming" » "coder model detecting logic programming" (Expand search), "coder code detection logic programming" (Expand search), "coder hole detecting logic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder detecting logical programming" (Expand search), "coder coder detecting loci programming" (Expand search), "coder coder detecting limit programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder detecting logic programming" (Expand search), "code code detecting logic programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec detecting logic programming" (Expand search)
"_ pythons python python programming" » "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder detecting logic programming") OR ("_ pythons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder detecting logic programming\") OR (\"_ pythons python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder detecting logic programming ) OR ( _ pythons python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder detecting logic programming") OR ("_ pythons python python programming"))*.