Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder detecting lineage programming" » "coder coder detecting lineage reprogramming" (Expand search), "coder coder detecting linear programming" (Expand search), "coder coder detecting lineal programming" (Expand search), "coder coder dissecting lineage programming" (Expand search), "coder coder detecting drainage programming" (Expand search), "coder coder detecting age programming" (Expand search), "coder model detecting lineage programming" (Expand search), "coder code detection lineage programming" (Expand search), "coder hole detecting lineage programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder detecting lineage programming" (Expand search), "code code detecting lineage programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec detecting lineage programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder detecting lineage programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder detecting lineage programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder detecting lineage programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder detecting lineage programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.