Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder detecting declarative programming" » "coder coder detecting reactive programming" (Expand search), "coder coder detecting generative programming" (Expand search), "coder coder detecting relative programming" (Expand search), "coder coder assessing declarative programming" (Expand search), "coder model detecting declarative programming" (Expand search), "coder code detection declarative programming" (Expand search), "coder hole detecting declarative programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder detecting declarative programming" (Expand search), "code code detecting declarative programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec detecting declarative programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder detecting declarative programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder detecting declarative programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder detecting declarative programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder detecting declarative programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.