Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder dependent lytic programming" » "coder coder dependent logic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder dependent conic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder dependent basic programming" (Expand search), "coder mode dependent lytic programming" (Expand search), "coder model dependent lytic programming" (Expand search), "coder node dependent lytic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder dependent anti programming" (Expand search), "coder coder dependent lipid programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder dependent lytic programming" (Expand search), "code code dependent lytic programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec dependent lytic programming" (Expand search)
"api pitons python python programming" » "api pitons pythons python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons piton python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "api citons python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitoni python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitoes python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder dependent lytic programming") OR ("api pitons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder dependent lytic programming\") OR (\"api pitons python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder dependent lytic programming ) OR ( api pitons python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder dependent lytic programming") OR ("api pitons python python programming"))*.