Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder dependent logical programming" » "coder coder dependent logic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder dependent physical programming" (Expand search), "coder coder dependent goal programming" (Expand search), "coder coder dependence logical programming" (Expand search), "coder coder dependent local programming" (Expand search), "coder mode dependent logical programming" (Expand search), "coder model dependent logical programming" (Expand search), "coder node dependent logical programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder dependent logical programming" (Expand search), "code code dependent logical programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec dependent logical programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder dependent logical programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder dependent logical programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder dependent logical programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder dependent logical programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.