Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder dependent in processing" » "coder mode dependent in processing" (Expand search), "coder model dependent in processing" (Expand search), "coder node dependent in processing" (Expand search), "coder coder dependent grain processing" (Expand search), "coder coder dependent corn processing" (Expand search), "coder coder dependent in process" (Expand search), "coder coder dependent and processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder dependent in processing" (Expand search), "code code dependent in processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec dependent in processing" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder dependent in processing") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder dependent in processing\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder dependent in processing ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder dependent in processing") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.