Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder dependent fragment programming" » "coder coder dependent agent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder dependent fragment programs" (Expand search), "coder coder dependent driven programming" (Expand search), "coder coder dependent treatment programming" (Expand search), "coder coder dependent pigment programming" (Expand search), "coder coder dependent patient programming" (Expand search), "coder mode dependent fragment programming" (Expand search), "coder model dependent fragment programming" (Expand search), "coder node dependent fragment programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder dependent fragment programming" (Expand search), "code code dependent fragment programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec dependent fragment programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder dependent fragment programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder dependent fragment programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder dependent fragment programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder dependent fragment programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.