Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder dependent conic programming" » "coder coder dependent logic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder dependent cone programming" (Expand search), "coder coder dependent convex programming" (Expand search), "coder mode dependent conic programming" (Expand search), "coder model dependent conic programming" (Expand search), "coder node dependent conic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder dependent chronic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder dependente cronico programming" (Expand search), "coder coder dependent economic programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder dependent conic programming" (Expand search), "code code dependent conic programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec dependent conic programming" (Expand search)
"and python python python programming" » "and pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "and piton python python programming" (Expand search), "and pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "on python python python programming" (Expand search), "api python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder dependent conic programming") OR ("and python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder dependent conic programming\") OR (\"and python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder dependent conic programming ) OR ( and python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder dependent conic programming") OR ("and python python python programming"))*.