Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder dependent basic programming" » "coder coder dependent based programming" (Expand search), "coder coder dependent logic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder dependent conic programming" (Expand search), "coder mode dependent basic programming" (Expand search), "coder model dependent basic programming" (Expand search), "coder node dependent basic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder dependent biphasic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder independent asic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder dependent baff programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder dependent basic programming" (Expand search), "code code dependent basic programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec dependent basic programming" (Expand search)
"and python python python programming" » "and pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "and piton python python programming" (Expand search), "and pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "on python python python programming" (Expand search), "api python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder dependent basic programming") OR ("and python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder dependent basic programming\") OR (\"and python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder dependent basic programming ) OR ( and python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder dependent basic programming") OR ("and python python python programming"))*.