Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder dependence efficient programming" » "coder coder dependence efficient processing" (Expand search), "coder coder dependence fragment programming" (Expand search), "coder coder dependence coefficient programming" (Expand search), "coder coder dependence coefficients programming" (Expand search), "coder coder dependent coefficient programming" (Expand search), "coder model dependence efficient programming" (Expand search), "coder power dependence efficient programming" (Expand search), "coder color dependence efficient programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder dependence efficient programming" (Expand search), "code code dependence efficient programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec dependence efficient programming" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder dependence efficient programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder dependence efficient programming\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder dependence efficient programming ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder dependence efficient programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.