Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder deep sequence pattern" » "coder coder deep sequential pattern" (Expand search), "coder coder deep virulence pattern" (Expand search), "coder coder deep frequent pattern" (Expand search), "coder coder deep sequenced pattern" (Expand search), "coder coder dp sequence pattern" (Expand search), "coder coder deep sequencing pattern" (Expand search), "coder decoder deep sequence pattern" (Expand search), "code code deep sequence pattern" (Expand search), "decoder codec deep sequence pattern" (Expand search), "coder under deep sequence pattern" (Expand search), "coder node deep sequence pattern" (Expand search), "coder decoders deep sequence pattern" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder deep sequence pattern") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder deep sequence pattern\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder deep sequence pattern ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder deep sequence pattern") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.