Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder decoupling on object" » "coder power decoupling on object" (Expand search), "coder modal decoupling on object" (Expand search), "coder budget decoupling on object" (Expand search), "coder coder decoupling of object" (Expand search), "coder coder decoupling in object" (Expand search), "coder coder decoupling and object" (Expand search), "coder decoder decoupling on object" (Expand search), "code code decoupling on object" (Expand search), "decoder codec decoupling on object" (Expand search), "coder coder decoupling an object" (Expand search), "coder coder decoupling en object" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder decoupling on object") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder decoupling on object\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder decoupling on object ) OR ( on python python python programming ))*.