Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder decomposition conic programming" » "coder mode decomposition conic programming" (Expand search), "coder over decomposition conic programming" (Expand search), "coder models decomposition conic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder decomposition on programming" (Expand search), "coder coder decomposition soil programming" (Expand search), "coder coder decomposition cover programming" (Expand search), "coder coder decomposition logic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder decomposition cone programming" (Expand search), "coder coder decomposition convex programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder decomposition conic programming" (Expand search), "code code decomposition conic programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec decomposition conic programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder decomposition conic programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder decomposition conic programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder decomposition conic programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder decomposition conic programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.