Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder decoding phase affect" » "coder coding decoding phase affect" (Expand search), "coder coder decoder phase affect" (Expand search), "coder barcode decoding phase affect" (Expand search), "coder coder decoding phage affect" (Expand search), "coder coder decoding the affect" (Expand search), "coder coder feeding phase affect" (Expand search), "coder coder decoding phase effect" (Expand search), "coder coder decoding change affect" (Expand search), "coder decoder decoding phase affect" (Expand search), "code code decoding phase affect" (Expand search), "decoder codec decoding phase affect" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder decoding phase affect") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder decoding phase affect\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder decoding phase affect ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder decoding phase affect") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.