Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder decoding learning effect" » "coder coder reading learning effect" (Expand search), "coder coder ending learning effect" (Expand search), "coder coder decoding reading effect" (Expand search), "coder coder decoding learning object" (Expand search), "coder coder decoding learning project" (Expand search), "coder coding decoding learning effect" (Expand search), "coder coder decoder learning effect" (Expand search), "coder barcode decoding learning effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder decoding learning effect" (Expand search), "code code decoding learning effect" (Expand search), "decoder codec decoding learning effect" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder decoding learning effect") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder decoding learning effect\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder decoding learning effect ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder decoding learning effect") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.