Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder decoder losing effect" » "coder coder decoder using effect" (Expand search), "coder encoder decoder losing effect" (Expand search), "coder coder decoder closing effect" (Expand search), "coder coder decoder loading effect" (Expand search), "coder coder decoder lasting effect" (Expand search), "code code decoder losing effect" (Expand search), "decoder codec decoder losing effect" (Expand search), "codesc poder decoder losing effect" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder decoder losing effect") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder decoder losing effect\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder decoder losing effect ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder decoder losing effect") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.