Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"on pythons python python programming" » "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "on pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "on pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "on python python python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "of python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder decoder and effect" » "coder encoder decoder and effect" (Expand search), "code code decoder and effect" (Expand search), "decoder codec decoder and effect" (Expand search), "codesc poder decoder and effect" (Expand search), "coder coder decode and effect" (Expand search), "coder coder encoder and effect" (Expand search), "coder coder decoder in effect" (Expand search), "coder coder decoder and effects" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder decoder and effect") OR ("on pythons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder decoder and effect\") OR (\"on pythons python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder decoder and effect ) OR ( on pythons python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder decoder and effect") OR ("on pythons python python programming"))*.