Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder decoder about objects" » "coder encoder decoder about objects" (Expand search), "coder coder decide about objects" (Expand search), "coder coder decided about objects" (Expand search), "coder coder decides about objects" (Expand search), "coder coder decoder about subjects" (Expand search), "coder coder decoder belt objects" (Expand search), "coder coder decoder art objects" (Expand search), "code code decoder about objects" (Expand search), "decoder codec decoder about objects" (Expand search), "codesc poder decoder about objects" (Expand search)
"in python pythin python programming" » "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythons python programming" (Expand search), "in python piton python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder decoder about objects") OR ("in python pythin python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder decoder about objects\") OR (\"in python pythin python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder decoder about objects ) OR ( in python pythin python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder decoder about objects") OR ("in python pythin python programming"))*.