Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder decoded by object" » "coder coder decoder by object" (Expand search), "coder encoder decoder by object" (Expand search), "coder codes recorded by object" (Expand search), "coder decoder decoded by object" (Expand search), "code code decoded by object" (Expand search), "decoder codec decoded by object" (Expand search), "coder coder decided by object" (Expand search), "coder coder recorded by object" (Expand search), "coder coder encoded by object" (Expand search), "coder coder decoded an object" (Expand search), "coder coder decoded en object" (Expand search), "coder coder decoded _ object" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder decoded by object") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder decoded by object\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder decoded by object ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder decoded by object") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.