Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder deciding when progressed" » "coder coder deciding who progressed" (Expand search), "coder coder deciding when processed" (Expand search), "coder coder deciding that progressed" (Expand search), "coder coder deciding the progressed" (Expand search), "coder coder defining when progressed" (Expand search), "coder coder decisions when progressed" (Expand search), "coder decoder deciding when progressed" (Expand search), "code code deciding when progressed" (Expand search), "decoder codec deciding when progressed" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder deciding when progressed") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder deciding when progressed\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder deciding when progressed ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder deciding when progressed") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.