Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder decided about objects" » "coder coder decoder about objects" (Expand search), "coder cases decided about objects" (Expand search), "coder coder decide about objects" (Expand search), "coder coder decides about objects" (Expand search), "coder coder decided not objects" (Expand search), "coder coder decided about subjects" (Expand search), "coder coder decided belt objects" (Expand search), "coder coder decided art objects" (Expand search), "coder decoder decided about objects" (Expand search), "code code decided about objects" (Expand search), "decoder codec decided about objects" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder decided about objects") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder decided about objects\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder decided about objects ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder decided about objects") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.