Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder decades in object" » "coder coder decoder in object" (Expand search), "coder four decades in object" (Expand search), "coder after decades in object" (Expand search), "coder decoder decades in object" (Expand search), "code code decades in object" (Expand search), "decoder codec decades in object" (Expand search), "coder coder decade in object" (Expand search), "coder coder decades of object" (Expand search), "coder coder decays in object" (Expand search), "coder coder decades an object" (Expand search), "coder coder decades en object" (Expand search), "coder coder decades and object" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder decades in object") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder decades in object\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder decades in object ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder decades in object") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.